Datasheet responses
Triage supplier completeness, then drill into the cleaned all-supplier grid. RFP 238244.
Response summary
Fill rate by section · sorted lowest first
Suppliers
31
Median fill
80%
Placeholder cells
880
Declined / no bid
2
| Intent | PreQ | Gen | DEI | Refs | T&C | SOW | Storm | Alt | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18% | 17% | |||||||||
| 100% | 74% | 22% | 17% | 100% | 19% | 33% | 47% | |||
| 100% | 52% | 49% | 38% | 52% | ||||||
| 100% | 61% | 58% | 96% | 11% | 100% | 100% | 63% | 53% | ||
| 100% | 74% | 16% | 54% | |||||||
| 100% | 52% | 55% | ||||||||
| 100% | 61% | 68% | 52% | 21% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 0% | 57% | |
| 100% | 55% | 58% | ||||||||
| 100% | 83% | 92% | 95% | 27% | 100% | 100% | 51% | 0% | 68% | |
| 100% | 65% | 84% | 100% | 35% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | ||
| 100% | 85% | 94% | 61% | 35% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 14% | 71% | |
| 100% | 57% | 83% | 100% | 65% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 74% | |
| 100% | 68% | 70% | 96% | 79% | 100% | 80% | 67% | 100% | 74% | |
| 100% | 66% | 65% | 100% | 94% | 100% | 80% | 69% | 100% | 77% | |
| 100% | 67% | 94% | 95% | 63% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 57% | 78% | |
| 100% | 92% | 99% | 83% | 39% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 57% | 80% | |
| 100% | 78% | 92% | 100% | 61% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 82% | |
| 100% | 86% | 97% | 91% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | |
| 100% | 89% | 78% | 90% | 74% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 0% | 83% | |
| 100% | 83% | 92% | 96% | 73% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 0% | 84% | |
| 100% | 76% | 97% | 100% | 71% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 84% | |
| 100% | 89% | 91% | 87% | 69% | 100% | 80% | 95% | 100% | 86% | |
| 100% | 85% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 87% | |
| 100% | 80% | 97% | 100% | 99% | 100% | 100% | 70% | 0% | 87% | |
| 100% | 71% | 94% | 96% | 96% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | |
| 100% | 74% | 92% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 57% | 89% | |
| 90% | 90% | |||||||||
| 100% | 85% | 94% | 96% | 100% | 100% | 80% | 95% | 57% | 92% | |
| 100% | 86% | 100% | 91% | 93% | 100% | 80% | 98% | 100% | 93% | |
| 100% | 93% | 89% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 95% | |
| 100% | 100% |
Fill rate0–25%25–50%50–75%75–100%Not yet submitted (distinct from 0%)
Key facts
| Yes | $87.5M | 225 | — | AMPP has limited knowledge on DTE's Bluesky processes and has not performed Units on the system before. | |
| Yes | $114.6M | 303 | None | ||
| Yes | $632.6M | 1,308 | The current scope shifts additional operational and administrative responsibility to the contractor through bundled work activities, expanded documentation requirements, invoice timing requirements, and reduced recovery through adders. These items may increase contractor overhead and operational costs compared to the current contract structure. Continued clarification around bundled work scope, billing expectations, and approval processes would help contractors price the work more accurately and competitively. | ||
| Yes | $59.0M | 185 | — | None | |
| Yes | contact ref | — | None | ||
| Yes | $51.0M | 115 | None | ||
| Yes | $104.9M | 638 | None | ||
| Yes | $107.0M | 878 | None | ||
| Yes | $3.66B | 408 | None | ||
| Declined | — | — | — | None | |
| Yes | $700.0M | 1,340 | All of our redlines in the billing & compensation document should be reviewed. If you are able to agree to our proposed redlines we can greatly reduce our overhead and thus DTE's prices | ||
| — | — | — | — | None | |
| Yes | $8.0M | 305 | None | ||
| Yes | $279.4M | 565 | None | ||
| Yes | $1.5M | 19 | None | ||
| Yes | $428.3M | 489 | None | ||
| Yes | $1.20B | 2,950 | None | ||
| Yes | $207.9M | 370 | None | ||
| Yes | $50.0M | 110 | — | None | |
| Yes | $962.2M | 2,141 | None | ||
| Declined | — | — | — | None | |
| Yes | $53.0M | 19 | None | ||
| Yes | $15.0M | 150 | None | ||
| Yes | $231.5M | 536 | None | ||
| Yes | $18.0M | 77 | None | ||
| Yes | $137.7M | 353 | Rauhorn has reviewed the Scope of Work and does not take exceptions at this stage. Cost drivers that may affect pricing include storm/emergency response expectations, standby or mobilization requirements, geographic dispersion across multiple zones, traffic control and hydrovac lead times, permitting/access delays, material availability, after-hours/outage windows, documentation/reporting requirements, and changes in fuel, labor, or equipment costs. Rauhorn recommends DTE provide clear annual/quarterly workload forecasts, zone-specific volumes, defined response categories, approved unit-rate structures for support services, and timely release of work packages to reduce contingency pricing. | ||
| Yes | $742.7M | 2,073 | None | ||
| Yes | — | 700 | None | ||
| Yes | $25.8M | 77 | None | ||
| Yes | $46.5M | 265 | Yes. Certain revisions to the unit structure and overall contract requirements impacted the pricing submitted by Universal. Several items that were previously captured separately under prior billing structures now appear to be incorporated into broader unit pricing expectations. As an example, required PPE, rubber glove usage, operational support items, and other field-related costs that were previously recoverable under separate units or operational billing scenarios now must be absorbed within the individual unit pricing structure. As a result, these costs had to be distributed across the applicable units to accurately reflect the true cost of safe field execution. In addition, the proposed contract term and scheduled labor increases under the applicable union agreements impacted pricing. Anticipated wage and benefit increases, including upcoming Local 17 labor adjustments occurring during the contract term, had to be accounted for within our submitted pricing to ensure long-term operational sustainability and workforce retention throughout the duration of the agreement. Universal also considered: - Rising equipment and operating costs - Fuel volatility - Safety and compliance requirements - Technology and operational tracking investments, and increasing administrative and reporting requirements associated with utility operations. As a suggestion, Universal believes additional clarification and standardization around what items are intended to be included within each unit versus separately recoverable operational costs would help create greater pricing consistency across bidders and improve long-term cost transparency for both DTE and contractors. In addition, periodic review mechanisms tied to major labor agreement changes or significant operational cost increases may help maintain pricing stability and contractor performance throughout the contract terms. | ||
| Yes | $87.1M | 541 | None |